It's 2009: Are we still programming for 800x600 browsers?

I'm in the midst of creating a couple of websites and was just wondering what is the "new" standard for screen resolutions.

I do remember a while back that the holy grail of screen resolutions was 800x600. Please please please tell me this has gone the way of the 8-track.

I'm thinking with the advent of cheap and powerful video cards, every up-to-date computer should be at minimum, 1024x768. (I'm hoping higher)

Has anyone looked at their stats program to see what your visitors screen resolution has been lately?

Comments
Ben Nadel's Gravatar While I have nothing against a design that is wider than 800, I really have problems with reading content areas that are wider than like 700 px. If the site is gonna get wider - add more columns, don't make the text wider.
# Posted By Ben Nadel | 1/7/09 6:06 PM
Gus's Gravatar Here are some stats from analyzing one of my sites:

1024x768    34.13%    

1280x800    23.03%    

1280x1024    18.36%    

1440x900    6.52%    

1680x1050    3.98%    

800x600    2.58%    

1280x768    1.85%    

1920x1200    1.79%    

1152x864    1.66%    

1400x1050    1.13%    

1600x1200    0.75%    

1280x960    0.68%    

1280x720    0.62%    

1152x720    0.36%    

1024x600    0.26%    

1344x840    0.23%    

1366x768    0.23%    

2560x960   0.19%    

320x396    0.19%    

1024x640    0.17%    

1120x840    0.13%
# Posted By Gus | 1/7/09 6:11 PM
Joel Richards's Gravatar We continued to program for 800X600 monitors because it was the "lowest common demoninator" until we started getting complaints from our clients about how skinny their web sites were looking. That was about a year ago. We've since revised our standard 1024 X 768.
I agree with Ben, though, if the site is going to be wider, add more columns. Wide columns of text are hard to read regardless of screen resolution.
# Posted By Joel Richards | 1/7/09 6:12 PM
Adrian J. Moreno's Gravatar 1024 x 768 has been the standard for a number of years now.
http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_display...

Personally, I think it all depends on the target audience of the website.

CNN was one of the first major news sites to adopt 1024x768, but what they did was wrap secondary news and navigation around their main content, which always fits within a 800x600 screen. Today, their top navigation area stretches to fit your screen, the content area fits within 1024x768 and their main news column fits within 600 pixels.

I had a number of arguments with marketing at my previous employer because they wanted the site to have a liquid layout, when most all of our competitors stuck to 800x600. Our content normally fit within 800x600 and we ended up with tons of CSS issues dealing with older browsers and the liquid layout.

If you use a CSS library like YUI Grids, you can test out layouts under different resolutions very easily.
# Posted By Adrian J. Moreno | 1/7/09 6:43 PM
Freelance Web Developer's Gravatar For a few years now I've only had designs submitted to me formatted for 1024 wide.
As Gus points out above, only 2.71% are using anything narrower.
# Posted By Freelance Web Developer | 1/7/09 6:48 PM
justin's Gravatar Whatcha doing about handheld devices? What are the standard displays on those? 320 by 480?
# Posted By justin | 1/7/09 7:10 PM
Admin's Gravatar @justin: I think this is a good read: http://www.alistapart.com/articles/pocket/
# Posted By Admin | 1/7/09 8:30 PM
Kumar's Gravatar I think 1024x768 and 1280x1024 are the most commen resolutions currently. It can also vary depending on your geographic location (or if you are targeting a specific geographic location).

I downloaded this <a href="http://www.brianapps.net/sizer.html">Sizer...; tool to see how my app/site looks like in different resoltions, unfortunately it doesn't have 1280x1024 option.
# Posted By Kumar | 1/8/09 1:23 AM
Kumar's Gravatar Sorry, didn't realize HTML was not allowed for comments.

Link to the Sizer tool: http://www.brianapps.net/sizer.html
# Posted By Kumar | 1/8/09 1:25 AM
Admin's Gravatar @Kumar: I believe I'll stick with Firefox's Web Developer plug in that does dynamic resizing of the browser to see how it'll look in various sizes that you set.
# Posted By Admin | 2/3/09 12:46 PM

Calendar

NAVIGATION

Recent Comments

RSS

Search

Subscribe

Tags